Dossier summary

Company Advertising Context

A careful bridge between a public regulatory record and the complaint's transparency concerns.

This page summarizes public records, third-party reporting, and disputed complaint materials. It does not state that unresolved allegations are true or that any person or entity violated the law unless a cited regulator or court record says so.

Professional record context

People named in the record

Public professional identifiers are provided for source review. Personal contact details are intentionally omitted.

Public professional profile

Vicki Smith

Role
New Home Sales Consultant
Organization
PulteGroup
License number:
Not established by current cited sources.

Pulte Homes Tennessee is listed in a separate public listing record as professional context only.

Vicki Smith's LinkedIn profile (opens in a new tab)

Public professional profile

Mackenzie Curtis

Role
Divisional Builder Manager
Organization
Acrisure Mortgage
NMLS ID
NMLS ID #471956

The submitted complaint identifies Mackenzie Curtis as a Mutual of Omaha Mortgage Regional Vice President, Builder Division, in August 2025. Her current official profile lists Acrisure Mortgage, so this site does not imply an ongoing Mutual affiliation.

Mackenzie Curtis's current official profile (opens in a new tab)

Public company context

Mutual of Omaha Mortgage

Public professional profile

Tony Fragale

Branch Manager, Vice President of Mortgage Lending

NMLS ID #76480

The cited official profile establishes public professional context only; it does not identify a connection to the Dupont complaint.

Official public profile (opens in a new tab)

What the 2025 order involved

The Massachusetts consent order involved allegations about advertising and paid content on a website, including whether advertisements were clearly separated from recommendations or educational content.

Mutual resolved the matter without admitting allegations or the existence of a violation.

Why it belongs in the dossier

The complaint raises transparency concerns in a different setting: loan-option presentation, disclosure timing, and product suitability.

The advertising order is therefore used as public background on transparency and consumer-protection oversight, not as proof that the Dupont loan allegations are true.

How to read the record

Pages should say that the order exists, summarize its subject, and state its limits.

Pages should not imply that an advertising consent order proves mortgage steering, bribery, or kickbacks in the Dupont transactions.

Related resources

Sources