Reference record

Source Record: Connecticut 2008 Kickbacks and Bribery Record

A separate public record involving insurance-related compensation allegations, not a finding on the Dupont loans.

This page summarizes public records, third-party reporting, and disputed complaint materials. It does not state that unresolved allegations are true or that any person or entity violated the law unless a cited regulator or court record says so.

Professional record context

People named in the record

Public professional identifiers are provided for source review. Personal contact details are intentionally omitted.

Public professional profile

Vicki Smith

Role
New Home Sales Consultant
Organization
PulteGroup
License number:
Not established by current cited sources.

Pulte Homes Tennessee is listed in a separate public listing record as professional context only.

Vicki Smith's LinkedIn profile (opens in a new tab)

Public professional profile

Mackenzie Curtis

Role
Divisional Builder Manager
Organization
Acrisure Mortgage
NMLS ID
NMLS ID #471956

The submitted complaint identifies Mackenzie Curtis as a Mutual of Omaha Mortgage Regional Vice President, Builder Division, in August 2025. Her current official profile lists Acrisure Mortgage, so this site does not imply an ongoing Mutual affiliation.

Mackenzie Curtis's current official profile (opens in a new tab)

Public company context

Mutual of Omaha Mortgage

Public professional profile

Tony Fragale

Branch Manager, Vice President of Mortgage Lending

NMLS ID #76480

The cited official profile establishes public professional context only; it does not identify a connection to the Dupont complaint.

Official public profile (opens in a new tab)

Company: Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.

Agency listed: Connecticut Attorney General

Year: 2008

Penalty listed: $1,700,000

Primary offense listed: Kickbacks and bribery

What the record establishes

Good Jobs First lists a 2008 Connecticut Attorney General record for Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co. under the primary offense type 'kickbacks and bribery' with a $1.7 million penalty.

The parent summary lists this as the single competition-related offense in the Mutual of Omaha parent-company summary.

Why it is included

The complaint in this dossier raises RESPA and anti-kickback questions in a separate mortgage context. This Connecticut record is therefore useful background on why compensation transparency matters.

The Connecticut record does not prove that a builder-lender kickback occurred at Legacy South, Mutual of Omaha Mortgage, or in the Dupont transactions.

Use in the investigative question

This page should be cited only for what the Good Jobs First record lists: company, year, agency, penalty, and offense category.

Any mortgage-specific bribery or kickback question must still be tested through loan-level records, referral agreements, builder incentive documents, and compensation files.

Related resources

Sources