Public professional profile
Rob Shell / Robert Hillman Shell
- Role
- Mortgage Loan Originator
- Organization
- Mutual of Omaha Mortgage
- NMLS ID
- NMLS ID #2226086
Dossier summary
Mutual of Omaha Mortgage Court and Public Records
A source-backed index of public records used to test transparency, advertising, disclosure, and borrower-facing risk themes.
This page summarizes public records, third-party reporting, and disputed complaint materials. It does not state that unresolved allegations are true or that any person or entity violated the law unless a cited regulator or court record says so.
Professional record context
People named in the record
Public professional identifiers are provided for source review. Personal contact details are intentionally omitted.
Public professional profile
Vicki Smith
- Role
- New Home Sales Consultant
- Organization
- PulteGroup
- License number:
- Not established by current cited sources.
Pulte Homes Tennessee is listed in a separate public listing record as professional context only.
Vicki Smith's LinkedIn profile (opens in a new tab)Public professional profile
Mackenzie Curtis
- Role
- Divisional Builder Manager
- Organization
- Acrisure Mortgage
- NMLS ID
- NMLS ID #471956
The submitted complaint identifies Mackenzie Curtis as a Mutual of Omaha Mortgage Regional Vice President, Builder Division, in August 2025. Her current official profile lists Acrisure Mortgage, so this site does not imply an ongoing Mutual affiliation.
Mackenzie Curtis's current official profile (opens in a new tab)Public company context
Mutual of Omaha Mortgage
Public professional profile
Tony Fragale
Branch Manager, Vice President of Mortgage Lending
NMLS ID #76480
The cited official profile establishes public professional context only; it does not identify a connection to the Dupont complaint.
Official public profile (opens in a new tab)Scope: Mutual of Omaha Mortgage and directly related public/free records
Primary court record: Longbridge Financial v. Mutual of Omaha Mortgage, S.D. Cal. 3:24-cv-01730
Privacy rule: Case identifiers only; no sensitive personal identifiers
How records are classified
This page separates court orders, allegations, settlements, consumer complaints, and screened-but-limited records.
A court order or regulator record is treated differently from a complaint allegation. A settlement or dismissal is not described as an admission unless the source says so.
Longbridge reverse mortgage advertising case
Longbridge Financial sued Mutual of Omaha Mortgage and related defendants in the Southern District of California, alleging deceptive reverse mortgage advertising and insufficient disclosure around review or comparison websites.
The May 13, 2025 preliminary injunction order granted relief in part and denied relief in part. The order is useful here because it discusses allegedly misleading advertising, disclosures, ownership/control of review sites, and consumer-confusion issues in a mortgage context.
HousingWire later reported that the parties agreed to a confidential settlement and then moved to dismiss the reverse mortgage marketing lawsuit with prejudice. This site treats that reporting as status context, not an admission of liability.
Section sources
Justia: Longbridge Financial v. Mutual of Omaha Mortgage, preliminary injunction orderFederal court order
Longbridge complaint PDF against Mutual of Omaha MortgageFederal court complaint PDF
CCH PDF mirror: Longbridge v. Mutual of Omaha Mortgage orderFederal court order PDF
HousingWire: Longbridge and Mutual of Omaha settlement reportMortgage industry reporting
HousingWire: Longbridge and Mutual of Omaha move to dismiss lawsuitMortgage industry reporting
Relevance to the Dupont complaint
The Longbridge case does not prove the Dupont DSCR loan allegations. It is included because it involves Mutual of Omaha Mortgage and public allegations or findings about mortgage-related transparency, advertising, disclosure placement, and consumer-facing presentation.
Those themes overlap with the Dupont complaint's request for review of loan-option presentation, closing-stage pressure, and whether the buyer was given clear and meaningful information before committing to a product path.
Baesel TCPA record
Baesel v. Mutual of Omaha Mortgage is included as a screened public court record involving Mutual of Omaha Mortgage and alleged consumer-contact conduct.
It is not a close match to the Dupont closing-pressure facts because the available order concerns venue in a TCPA-style consumer-contact dispute, not home-purchase closing or DSCR loan steering.
Section sources
Justia: Baesel v. Mutual of Omaha Mortgage TCPA caseFederal court order
Records excluded or treated as limited
Cases where Mutual of Omaha Mortgage appears only as mortgagee, assignee, lienholder, or nominal party are excluded unless the record alleges borrower-facing misconduct.
Insurance-company records are kept on separate source pages unless the source directly connects the conduct to Mutual of Omaha Mortgage.
Consumer reviews and BBB complaints remain useful pattern sources, but they are not treated as court findings.
Related resources
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau complaint portalRegulator portal
NMLS Consumer AccessLicensing lookup
CFPB Regulation Z, 12 CFR Part 1026Federal regulation
Sources
Justia: Longbridge Financial v. Mutual of Omaha Mortgage, preliminary injunction orderFederal court order
Longbridge complaint PDF against Mutual of Omaha MortgageFederal court complaint PDF
CCH PDF mirror: Longbridge v. Mutual of Omaha Mortgage orderFederal court order PDF
HousingWire: Longbridge and Mutual of Omaha settlement reportMortgage industry reporting
HousingWire: Longbridge and Mutual of Omaha move to dismiss lawsuitMortgage industry reporting
Justia: Baesel v. Mutual of Omaha Mortgage TCPA caseFederal court order